Tuesday, February 27, 2018

Does the U.S. Government's right to examine digital evidence stop at the border?

The Supreme Court is hearing a case this week, U.S. v. Microsoft, which will have broad implications in defining the scope of governmental powers in the age of cloud computing.

As described in the New York Times, in 2013, federal agents served Microsoft with a warrant to get the emails of a suspected drug trafficker. Microsoft turned over the suspect's account information and address book, but did not turn over the content of the email messages themselves. Those messages were stored on servers located in Ireland.

The question before the Court is whether the government can obtain warrants pertaining to assets located outside its own borders.

Craig Newman is right that both sides have a legitimate argument to make.  On the one hand, the government - with a warrant - should be able to investigate things like drug trafficking, terrorism, child pornography, and fraud to the greatest extent the law allows. Where the server storing the 0s and 1s of a particular email happens to be located on any given day should be a secondary concern to the larger interest of public safety.

On the other hand, Microsoft rightfully asserts that, if the U.S. government can potentially have access to all data stored by American-based companies - even on overseas servers - then, at best, American tech companies will be at a serious competitive disadvantage, and at worst, they won't be allowed to conduct business at all with many of the largest economies in the world that have stronger privacy laws in place. Germany, for example, has already publicly stated that if the court rules against Microsoft in this case that it will not use any American company for its data services.

Newman proposes a solution whereby the determining factors ought to be the citizenship and geographical location of the individual whose data the government seeks, rather than the physical location of the data. However I believe he misses the point. By his own admission, the real problem lies not in where the server is physically located, but in how data is dynamically stored. All of the 0s and 1s that together make up a single email message are increasingly broken up into millions of individual bits that are then stored on different servers in different locations around the world.  It only becomes, what we perceive as, a single email message when it is reassembled on the requesting end.  In fact, to think of an email message as one single entity stored in one single place is an outdated and increasingly obsolete notion.

It would also be problematic to pursue another suggestion - that the determining factor should be based on where the data can be accessed. The argument there goes that, despite the server being in Ireland, the fact that Microsoft could click a button in Redmond, Washington and immediately have access to those emails ought to guide the law.  However, this too would open up a Pandora's Box considering that the entirety of the Web itself is based on such a system of data, software, and front-end interfaces (i.e. - websites) being accessible with a similar click of a button. Would such a plan, by extension, also grant the U.S. government jurisdiction to virtually all public facing content on the Web?  It's a slippery slope.

Personally, I believe that the public safety interests here ought to trump the (legitimate) fears of an extension of the surveillance State.  My reasoning is that, because of dynamic cloud-based storage, to only grant law enforcement the ability to investigate digital assets that are exclusively located in the geographic U.S. will make it virtually impossible to conduct any type of modern investigation. The digital realm is, after all, borderless, by definition. The legislative effort should focus instead on creating some other checks intent on curbing the actual abuse of such power.

And, no, the blockchain is not the answer either.



At 7:23 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

The Mobile Accessories is a largest mobile retail Chain dealing in leading international and Indian Brands of mobile phones and accessories headquartered with using special offers and low cost of the latest branded mobile phones. This is amazing offers with some of days.

Mobile Showrooms in OMR

At 3:32 AM, Blogger Pallavi karthi said...

I simply want to tell you that I’m all new to blogs and truly liked you’re blog site. Very likely I’m likely to bookmark your site .You surely come with remarkable articles. Cheers for sharing your website page.
Economics Journal
Journal Of Ecology
Thesis by publication
National Journal
Journal Of Information Technology

At 2:38 PM, Blogger شركة المثالي سوبر said...

شركة كشف تسرب المياه بالدمام

التخلص من رائحة الحمام بالخبر

شركة تنظيف منازل مكافحة حشرات عوازل 0550171619

شركة مكافحة حشرات بنجران
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بخميس مشيط

At 5:25 AM, Blogger John Grace said...

Bitcoin bulls are optimistic again and for good reason we have seen the price trading around $10k support level strongly, Nevertheless, for some days bitcoin has been moving in a close range between $9,800 and $10,200 area and If bulls are able to push the Bitcoin price above this resistance level in the near-term, it will likely ignite an upwards movement that would send it straight towards $11k – $12k level. Well bitcoin has been one of my source of income and it’s been successful because i was smart enough to find the right strategy/daily signals to trade with ever since the last bear market, alex has been providing me with his daily signals and also guidance to trade, again i was able to grow my 1.5btc to 8btc within three weeks of trading with Alex daily signals, i must say no time is ever too late to buy and start trading. Alex can be reach via E-mail: totalinvestmentcompany@gmail.com
  WhatsApp: +1(929)390-8581
https://t.me/totalinvestment for inquiries into profitable trading systems.  


Post a Comment

<< Home