Over the weekend, a cyberwar ensued between two highly controversial groups - Anonymous and the Ku Klux Klan. As ZDNet reports
, at issue was the upcoming grand jury verdict in the Michael Brown case in Ferguson, MO. Here is the sequence of what went down...
A Klan group named the Traditionalist American Knights of the KKK distributed flyers
last week threatening the use of "lethal force" against the protesters in Ferguson. In response, members of the hacktivist group Anonymous "skirmished" with the KKK on Twitter, at which point, after being "mocked and threatened", Anonymous launched a full-blown cyberwar campaign called #OpKKK
and ultimately seized control of the Klan's main Twitter account, @KuKluxKlanUSA
Anonymous then issued this statement
explaining how the Klan is a terrorist group with blood on their hands and, as a result, the Klan "no longer has the right to express their racist, bigoted opinions".
But the story's not finished. The Klan responded by using their other primary Twitter account, @KLANonymous
, to post this message...
Anonymous then quickly seized control of that account as well.
Meanwhile, Anonymous has also been launching Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks on much of the Klan's online presence. They've shut down websites like IKKK.com and TraditionalistAmericanKnights.com as well as the Klan's largest discussion board, Stormfront.
Now Anonymous has turned its focus towards identifying Klan members with its #HoodsOff
campaign. They are doing this by looking at the Direct Messages sent over time to the Klan's seized Twitter accounts, although Anonymous explicitly acknowledges
that they are still debating to what extent people's identities should be made public, considering that they "are not completely sure how much of a connection many of the people actually have to the KKK" and want to make sure they are outing the right people.
That about sums it up. For now.
First of all, is it somewhat surprising to anyone else that officially recognized active hate groups and domestic terrorist organizations have non-secretive Twitter accounts? Call me naive, but wouldn't a Twitter account called @AlQaeda or a website named "www.alqaeda.com" be shut down by homeland security or law enforcement officials immediately? How does Twitter even allow something called @KuKluxKlanUSA to exist? There's no technical reason which would make removal difficult; it's just a policy decision.
Second, let us also not forget that Anonymous is considered by many to be a criminal, even cyberterrorist
, organization as well, having previously launched attacks against U.S. government agencies, police departments, and even launched anti-Israel cyberattacks on Holocaust Remembrance Day. So before Anonymous is applauded too strongly for their efforts against the KKK, let's just keep in mind that they're not exactly heroes by any stretch of the imagination.
Third, it should be observed that Anonymous is getting better at what they do. The speed at which they managed to seize control of the Klan's Twitter accounts and launch effective DDoS attacks that shut down numerous websites and discussion boards was impressive, even by their own standards. It makes their calling card, "You should have expected us", even that much more frightening.
No one's going to have, nor should have, any sympathy for the Ku Klux Klan, and in that sense this is a story with a positive outcome. With that said, in the larger scheme of things, it remains difficult for other hacktivists to sympathize with Anonymous either because their problem is that they pursue their stated goal of freedom basically through intimidation. If you cross them, they will attack you. This blog has been flamed by Anonymous before, and to be honest, it does indeed make one hesitate from writing about them further. And that's the problem. Anonymous creates a very real chilling effect on the very speech they claim to protect.